: The Faulking Truth : Search There are now 131 entries in this blog <<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 >>> Viewing entries 17 to 24. Forget Iraq & Democracy-This is About Stopping the Perverts! I just read an AOL poll on Iraq. 55% of respondents believe that the Bush Adminstration is doing a poor job in Iraq, while only 9% said we are doing an excellent job. 85% say that they aren't surprised at the level of unrest in Iraq. EIGHTY-FIVE PERCENT! Half of those who voted believe that the Iraqi election won't be legitimate AT ALL, while only 18% think it will be very legitimate. But 67% those same voters believe the election should be held on schedule. Okay, let me get this straight....somewhere out there, 18% of you think the Iraqi election will be a total sham, but you think we should have the election anyway? In other words, you either don't give a damn whether or not Iraq really becomes a "democracy", or you don't think that being a democracy and having fair elections have anything to do with each other. Guess what, America? Either way, we're screwed. And....this is even more disturbing....somewhere out there, 4% of you think our policy in Iraq is terrible, BUT YOU STILL VOTED FOR BUSH!!!! What was it that swayed you? Was it the fact that he wants to eventually cut Social Security benefits in half? Or maybe it's his desire to destroy the environment. No? Then it must be his expertise at creating jobs during his first term. Oh, I'm sorry, he LOST more jobs than any president since the Depression. Or was it because he sold us out to the big pharmacuetical companies and banned buying prescription drugs from foreign countries? At least he did do one thing. He kept those immoral Gay couples from getting married. And that directly effects us because..... ummm, because.....well, because they're all a bunch of queers, dammit! And stopping those perverts is a lot more important than taking care of our elderly, healthcare, education, the environment, stopping a war that the majority of Americans don't agree with, or a bunch of stupid jobs. So, in forty years, when your children or grandchildren are living in poverty in a world destroyed by greed and war (unless of course they're KILLED in one of the "holy wars" we'll be fighting until God knows when), you can at least take personal satisfaction in knowing that you kept the Gay couple that lives up the street from me from getting a piece of paper that says "Marriage License" on it. Whew....thanks for that, I'll sleep better tonight. Tuesday , January 11, 2005  03:11 Supporting the Inauguration Day Boycott.....Sort of A week or so ago, I first heard the idea of an Inauguration Day Boycott. As with most boycotts, I read the first couple of emails I received with a certain amount of skepticism. Of course, I'm still underestimating the "Power of the Blog" (even though our little website has had a modicum of success in it's own right). It wasn't long before the "Mainstream Media", who now steal the vast majority of their stories from the Internet (instead of the other way around, like it was a year ago), picked up on this "grassroots" effort, and took it nationwide. Now, it looks like the boycott might actually have legs, and that it might accomplish..... well, it won't accomplish a damn thing, but at least it will make a point. And that point is, ummm, that point is, well, WE'RE MAD AS HELL, AND WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE! Here's the plan: every mad as hell person in America refuses to buy anything on January 20th, the day of the Presidential Inauguration. That's right, no gas, no groceries, no Big Macs. So, as a fellow Pissed-off American, I should support this boycott....why? Here's what will happen: businesses will do 50% more business than normal on January 19th, and 50% more business than normal on January 21st, and the net result will be - ZERO, NADA, ZILCH, RIEN, NIENTE....you get the idea. But wait, there's more! We're supposed to stay home from work on January 20th as well. That'll show 'em! Now that might actually cut back on spending just a tad, because, well, everyone's pay checks will be less that week. So, every rich executive will still get their full paycheck, while the poor working sucker will lose a day's pay. And guess what? CEOs get paid 400 times more than you do as it is, thanks in large part to the current Republican Administration (okay, thanks to every administration). Excuse me for being pessimistic, but I get the feeling that no one really stopped to think this one through. But....and hear me out on this before you stomp off in a "mad as hell" huff....all is not lost. The Faulking Truth is, I support the Inauguration Day Boycott.....sort of. I mean, with a little tweaking, this thing might actually accomplish something. Here's my idea: Forget the pointless "Ban on Spending" crap, instead, we should boycott Corporate America. That's right, instead of shopping at the WalMart Super Center, go to the nearest Mom and Pop grocery store or the roadside vegetable stand. Instead of buying that hammer at Home Depot or Lowe's, find one of those little family-owned hardware stores that barely scrape by, and buy it there. Instead of eating out at one of the multitude of "National Restaurant Chains", go to that little diner that you've been driving by for years thinking "You know, we really should try that place sometime". And forget about skipping work, especially if you work at one of the Mega-rich Corporations that we've all been complaining about. Hell, work overtime if you can get away with it, and then take THAT money and spend it at one of the small businesses that we just discussed. See how this works? Instead of spending your money at WalMart a day early or a day late, SPEND IT SOMEWHERE ELSE! Don't just postpone giving your money to Corporate America, take it away from them altogether. And you never know, you just might like that Mom and Pop grocery store, that road side vegetable stand, that family-owned hardware store, and that little diner so much that you stop shopping at the huge corporate-owned megastores altogether. And make no mistake, THAT would send the Bush Administration a clear message. THAT would let them know that WE'RE MAD AS HELL AND WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE! Thursday , January 13, 2005  04:01 Look everybody, we've found WMDRPAs! This Tuesday during his State of the Union Address, 1,028 days after the war in Iraq was officially launched (and 986 days after we "accomplished our mission"), President Bush finally announced the primary reason for declaring war on Iraq. No, it wasn't weapons of mass destruction, that search was offically called off on Wednesday. No, it wasn't Iraq'a ties to 9/11 (there weren't any). And no, it wasn't because Iraq was supporting Al Queda (they weren't). And it wasn't even "Operation Iraqi Freedom", that was just a catchy slogan that the Administration spoon fed the media and the American public. (Faulking Truth to Karl Rove: helluva job on that one.) But now, none of that matters, because now we know the real reason Americans are dying in Iraq, now we know the real reason over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians have been killed, now we know the real reason we started "Vietnam - The Sequel". No, iraq didn't have WMDs, and in fact, according to chief U.N. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, not only did Iraq not possess any weapons of mass destruction, THEY HAD NOT MADE ANY SINCE 1991. But who cares? According to Bush, they might not have had WMDs, but they had "weapons-of-mass-destruction-related program activities". That's right, we declared war on Iraq because they had WMDRPAs. And they might not have possessed REAL WMDs, but as Bush said in October, Saddam Hussein "retained the knowledge, the materials, the means and the intent to produce weapons of mass destruction, and he could have passed that knowledge on to our terrorist enemies", which leads us nicely into reason number two for the Iraqi Quagmire...I mean the Iraqi War....no wait, I mean the "Iraqi Peace Mission" (God, I love that one, it's so....so peaceful sounding). Reason Number Two? Saddam Hussein IS the Weapon of Mass Destruction, or SHITWMD. See, don't you feel stupid for ever doubting our President? And you thought we were just an occupying military force that aggressively invaded a country that had committed no act of aggression towards us whatsoever. Gee, I feel so silly. Now, just let me take a good look at those WMDRPAs that prove that SHITWMD, and I'll take back everything I ever said about Bush being a WMBOGD. (That's "Warmonger Bent on Global Domination", in case you were wondering). And THAT'S the Faulking Truth. (Voice your Faulking Opinion in our Guestbook @ http://www.faulkingtruth.com/GuestBook/ ) Friday , January 14, 2005  03:40 Confessions of....A Christian I'm a Christian, complete with all of the good qualities of every Christian. I am weak, sinful, jealous, judgemental, lustful, greedy, egotistical, materialistic, narrowminded.....oh, sorry, wrong list. Let's try that again..... I'm a Christian, complete with all of the good qualities of every Christian. I am kind, giving, caring, forgiving, thoughtful, honest, humble, and above all, loving. So, which is it? If in fact I AM totally honest (which I'm not, because I'm human), then I would admit that, like all Christians (correction: like all humans), I am trapped somewhere in the middle. I WANT to be the perfect person, live my life as a reflection of every Christian value, and "walk the walk", but in reality, I AM weak, and that weakness makes me susceptible to every sin ever invented by mankind. And like all Christians, I spend a great deal time dealing with the guilt that accompanies those sins and weaknesses. As a American, I have the right (and in the opinion of most great American patriots throughout history, the duty) to question the politics that affect every one of us, to speak out about the policies that affect all Americans, and to voice my opinion on any damn topic I choose to. However, as an American OR as a Christian (contrary to what the "Religious Right" will tell you, adnauseam), I do not have the right to legislate morality, to dictate lifestyles, or to deny others the same rights that I enjoy. In other words, I don't have the right to judge others. I can disagree with you all day long, and if you've read more than two sentences of my writing, you know that I will, but when it comes to morality, I'm not in any way qualified to "cast the first stone". As we move into the new millineum with both hope and a certain amount of trepidation, our world is in dire need of role models. The role models and heroes of the past, the Martin Luthrt Kings, the John and Bobby Kennedys, the John Lennons, have been replaced by a cadre of greedy politicians, judgemental religious zealots, and spoiled celebrities. The Christian Fundamentalists have become so pious and so judgemental that they have alienated those who they should be reaching out to. They have spent so much time justifying their own materialistic excesses, flaunting their perceived moral superiority, and being judgemental of what they see as shortcomings in others, that they have forgotten what it means to be "kind, giving, caring, forgiving, thoughtful, honest, humble, and above all, loving." They have forgotten how to be Christians. My own reasons for calling myself a Christian are personal. Like Mike Bohling in his article "the Lonesome Gods" http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Commentary/1026.html , I too believe that this world is "too perfect to be random". Here are my arguments for the existence of God (or at least a "higher authority"), and they have nothing to do with homosexuals, abortion, or "moral values" (sorry, Reverand Falwell): Witness the birth of your first child (or any child). HOLD your child in your arms, look into their eyes, and feel the connection. THEN tell me it's all a totally random accident. Sit on a hilltop in Oklahoma, and watch a sunrise or a sunset, and tell me that the wonderment and awe that you experience is just a chemical reaction inside of your brain. Paint a painting, write something, sculpt something, or write a song, where it just flows out of you, and you are no more than the conduit, trying to get it down before it "goes away". THEN tell me God doesn't exist. And finally, fall in love. Not the typical, high school "Damn, she's so hot" kind of love, but the "all-consuming, can't live without her, heart stops beating every time she floats through your mind" kind of love. If you can do all of those things, and not believe in a "higher power" of some type, then you're truly on your own. Good luck to you. Some of the most caring, passionate, and loving people I know don't call themselves Christians, but in many ways, they are more Christian-like in their values, their morals, and their actions than most Bible thumping, church going Fundamentalists. And as a Christian, I choose to believe that MY personal God will recognize that, in the end, those kind, loving, caring people will receive their just rewards. And if you don't agree with me, then that's okay. I'm not here to judge. Tuesday , January 18, 2005  03:10 Have a Crappy... I Mean... Happy Valentine's Day By Kelsey Renee Faulk So here I am, sitting at the computer doing chapter summaries of Great Expectations By Charles Dickens and eating miniature marshmallows. Tomorrow is Valentine's Day- the day of torture. The day set just to remind us single folk that we are.... well single. And pathetic. And probably sitting at our computer eating miniature marshmallows and indulging ourselves in work. Whoopee. A dozen red roses for you, dear sweet Biddy? I think not. Nope. Not for good old, kind-hearted, hard working, average looking, but beautiful, Biddy. Nope. Nadda. Never. You know what she gets? Zip. Zilch. Zero. Whatever. And those roses go to... (Drum roll please...)... the rich and beautiful, but deadly, Estella, as always. So instead of smelling roses and eating chocolates, we watch TV. And on the TV, we watch people smelling roses and eating chocolates. And for the supernatural shows, it’s the other way around: they eat their roses and smell their chocolates. Or is that just me? Oh, wait! How would I know? I never get any roses or chocolates. I'm the one watching and eating bonbons... or was it miniature marshmallows? Oh well. It's just not worth it, anyway . So I can tell that you already know that this isn't really going to be an article. Let alone a story or poem or anything that entertaining, at that. This is just a teenage girl complaining about being single on yet another of the worst holiday's ever invented: Valentine's Day. This isn't an article. Nope. No sir-ee. And if you'd like to call it one, call it the world's worst article ever written. This is simply a reminder to all those people who spend Valentine's Day watching Titanic and eating ice cream out of the carton that they are not alone. I repeat. You are not alone. Now of course, everyone knows that there are those people who say that they hate Valentine's Day, and then you see them walk out of work or school with a beautiful guy in one hand and a giant teddy bear and a dozen roses in the other. I mean, take me for instance. I've got one of the world's most perfect boyfriends, and here I am freaking out because I might actually have a good Valentine's Day for the first time in my life. But who am I to complain? This year, I'm not complaining for me, I'm complaining for the ones who truly think that Valentine's Day.... well.... sucks. But, in order to get the right to complain, you need to have at least 1 of the following qualities this Valentine's Day: 1. You received a lump of coal in your stocking this.... wait wrong holiday. Okay, here we go again.... 1. If you have been broken up with on Valentine's Day. 2. If you received a candy gram that was sent to the wrong person on Valentine's Day... that wrong person being you. 3. If you received a chocolate rose from the smelly guy that follows you around everywhere... AKA: your stalker. 4. If there was poison ivy in the flower bouquet that was from your secret admirer. 5. If the only candy you receive on Valentine's Day is from your mom and your math teacher. 6. If you've ever sent yourself a gift on Valentine's Day just to look important in front of everyone else. And last, but not least... 7. If your boyfriend ever offered to take you out for a romantic dinner on Valentine's Day, and went to all the trouble to blindfold you and everything... and then the blindfold was taken off, and you see two glowing and pretty golden arches.... Right now I'm too busy eating marshmallows to finish this list. It could go on forever, you know. But since alot of you reading this won't have anything to do this February 14th, you can take that time to finish this list yourself. Have a crappy.... I mean.... Happy Valentine's Day! Monday , February 14, 2005  00:50 'THE END OF BLOCKBUSTER!' It was a dream come true......No longer would we have to stay up until 3 in the morning watching three movies in a row just to avoid the dreaded "late fee" for movies that invariably weren't even worth the $4 we paid to rent them in the first place, much less the additional $4 for returning them past the due date. "THE END OF LATE FEES!" It screamed at us from the TV commercials, in print ads, and in multiple giant posters plastered across the front of Blockbuster stores. After being lured to Hollywood Video a year earlier by longer rental periods and a wider selection of those hard-to-find quirky little movies that we so love,and because Blockbuster had unceremoniously dismantled their "Sundance" movie section, scattering them across the store into the generic categories of "drama", "western", "science fiction", and "whatever", we boldly ventured back into Blockbuster that very evening, the prodigal sons returning home. We picked out three movies.....oh, what the hell, let's get four, because "NO LATE FEES!". And when it took us a few extra days to watch the last movie, it didn't matter, because (you guessed it) "NO LATE FEES!" We returned the movie feeling secure in the knowledge that at least we wouldn't be paying $8 to see a movie that was barely worth $4. And then, we learned the truth about advertising....there is no truth in advertising. "THE END OF LATE FEES!" really meant "THE END OF LATE FEES....BECAUSE YOU JUST BOUGHT THE DAMN MOVIE!" That's right, suckers....I mean, fellow Americans....we weren't charged a late fee, we were instead charged $30 for the cost of the video (or was it $20? I can't remember because I was so pissed off at the very concept of such blatant deception that I went deaf after my wife explained the basic scam to me.). I do remember saying, even before she was finished with her tirade, that it was a lawsuit waiting to happen, and that millions of customers would be just as incredulous across the country as we were in our little corner of it. My wife, in beautiful "We're mad as hell, and we're not gonna take it anymore!" fashion, bitched until the store manager promised to credit our account for the overcharge. Two days later, we drove to Blockbuster to rent another movie.....and turned left and pulled into Hollywood Video instead. For us, it the was "THE END OF BLOCKBUSTER!". And sure enough, in the first of what promises to be dozens of lawsuits, New Jersey Attorney General Peter Harvey filed suit against Blockbuster, saying that "Blockbuster's ads are fraudulent and deceptive". Duh. It doesn't take an attorney, much less an Attorney General, to figure that one out. Blockbuster spokeswoman Karen Raskoph said (with a straight face, no less), "We are disappointed he took this action because we believe the end of late fees program is a terrific program, and we've received terrific feedback from our customers and employees." She also said that they had done everything to explain to customers how the scam.....sorry, the "program" works, utilizing three shells and a magic wand as visual aids. Okay, I added that last part, but you get the idea....IT WAS A CON! NO ONE, I REPEAT, NO ONE EXPLAINED A DAMN THING TO US.....until AFTER we returned our video. "Good news, Valued Customer, now you can watch 'Stupid White Chicks' over and over again without having to worry about paying a late fee....BECAUSE YOU JUST BOUGHT IT, SUCKER!" Wait, that's not even the best part. While we (and, I'm guessing, millions of other Blockbuster customers) "take our business elsewhere" by renting from Hollywood Video instead, Blockbuster has been busy trying to take over.....anyone care to fill in the blank here?....Surprise!....Hollywood Video. That's right, folks. Can't beat the competition? No problem, we'll just BUY the competition. God, I love this country! Hmmmm, I wonder what's on TV tonight. Nothing? Damn. Wait, I know! Let's watch "Stupid White Chicks" again! Saturday , February 19, 2005  07:47 The Poor Get Poorer..... It's official. The Republicans in Congress don't give a damn about helping America, or Americans. For all they care, you and I could live in poverty for the rest of our lives. Yesterday, they voted down not one, but two proposals to raise the minimum wage, which has been stuck at "just enough to starve on" since 1996. That's right, it wasn't enough just to vote it down once, they had to make their point more emphatically by saying to Americans, "you're not worth $7.25 an hour, in fact, you won't be worth that in 2006". Nope, they had to give the knife a few extra twists by voting down a second proposal, in effect adding, "Hell, you're not even worth $6.25 an hour." As always, Republican leaders espoused the usual party-line excuse about raising the minimum wage being bad for "small businesses", a claim that they have never backed up with actual evidence. On the contrary, 12 states have passed minimum wage laws that make the minimum wage is those states higher than the national minimum wage, and statistics show that there has been no adverse effect on small businesses in the affected states. Make no mistake about it, this isn't about small business, it's about BIG business, and lining the pockets of the already filthy rich CEOs and owners of the WalMarts and the McDonalds of the world. Now, granted, it's not that hard to get by on a Congressman's annual salary of $158,103, and the Congressional "leaders" earn up to $203,000 a year. To put that in perspective, let's pretend that they actually work 40 hours a week every week of the year (key word: "pretend"). Even if they did (remember, we're pretending), they would still be earning....well, not actually "earning", maybe "getting paid" would be more accurate....$76.01 per hour, or almost 15 times the current minimum wage. Of course, that doesn't include those generous expense accounts, travel expenses, and all those little "lobbyist perks" that line their pockets, OR the fact that a good portion of them are already millionaires to begin with, but we'll pretend (there we go, pretending again) that they actually have to get by in the real world on their modest little paychecks, just like the rest of us. How many of your friends make $76.00 an hour? None? Mine, either. The fact is, Congress hasn't raised the minimum wage since 1996, while inflation has risen by over 20%. In stark contrast to that fact, Congress has voted themselves a total of $16,700 in raises in just the past six years, and their salary has increased $60,000 since 1990. Again, let's put that in perspective: THEIR PAY RAISES ALONE OVER THE PAST 15 YEARS AMOUNTS TO ALMOST SIX TIMES WHAT A WORKING AMERICAN ON MINIMUM WAGE EARNS. In a statement released after Congress gave themselves yet another pay raise last year, Tom Schatz, president of the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, put it this way: "Members of Congress have the only job in the country whose occupants can set their own salary without regard to performance, profit, or economic climate. Clearly, members must think that money grows on trees. With a $480 billion deficit, the escalating cost of the war in Iraq, and a stagnant economy, Congress should be curbing spending, not lining their pockets at our expense." And guess what? While Americans scrape by, losing more and more benefits every year (Remember the per child tax deduction those of us who made under $20,000 used to get? They took that away from us at the same time they were giving a massive tax break to the rich.), and hoping that our Republican-controlled Congress will toss up some kind of bone in the form of a meager minimum wage increase, their pay raises are automatic! They actually have to vote to TURN DOWN their pay raise (which was a not too shabby $3,400 last year), and they haven't done that in the past six years. Another quote from Tom Schatz: "This underserved pay raise is no surprise, as the 108th Congress has shown a voracious appetite for spending. It goes to show how out of touch with reality politicians can be. They forget that their salaries are paid by taxpayers. Americans are being forced to tighten their belts—if they even have a job—yet members of Congress will have an extra $3,400 to do with as they please." Are you pissed off yet? No? Well, try this one on for size: While Bush and his cohorts are trying to REDUCE your social security benefits, raise the retirement age, and pump your retirement money into a corrupt stock market, members of Congress enjoy a retirement package (courtesy of you and I, the taxpayers) that takes effect as early as the age of fifty, and they "earn" (sorry, that word is really taking a beating here) an average of almost $4,000 a month for life. And that doesn't even include THEIR social security benefits, the lucrative "consultant" and lobbyists jobs waiting for most of them after they leave Congress, or, once again, the fact that a large percentage of them are already millionaires, and don't need the money anyway. And lest you think I'm being partisan by singling out Republicans in this article, take a look at this: In the vote to raise the minimum wage to $7.25 per hour, EVERY VOTE opposing the measure was cast by Republicans. I repeat....It's official. Republicans don't give a damn about helping America, or Americans. And that, fellow wage earners, is the faulking truth. Read more about how Congress is giving the shaft to working class Americans while they themselves live in luxury: "Senate defeats minimum-wage plans" http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/03/05/minimum.wage.ap/ "Salary will jump by $3,400 a year in 2004" http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/agencies/a/raise4congress.htm "Salaries and Benefits of U.S. Congress Members" http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa031200a.htm "Minimum Wage and Its Effects on Small Business" http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoints_raising_minimum_wage_2004 "40 millionaires in US Senate" http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/sen-j07.shtml Post your opinion in our Guestbook at www.faulkingtruth.com/GuestBook/ Wednesday , March 9, 2005  02:46 Refinancing your home the 'hard' way..... We've been inundated with "Guestbook spam" the past few weeks, and each one gets more creative than the one before....and some are just downright bizarre. When this one promising "dating AND mortgage refinancing" was posted late last night, like Russell in my little scenario, I couldn't resist. Oh, and someone needs to tell Russell that a 7% "interest rate" is nothing to be ashamed of. Here's the Guestbook post, along with my response. Mortgage refinancing was never this stimlulating: Guestbook post: Dating http://www.mortgage-rate-interest.com 11 March 2005 - Dating ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Editor's Comments:: -  So which is it? Dating or mortgage refinancing? That evening at dinner: "Mmmmm....baby, you are so hot. I can't believe you'd want to go out with an old guy like me. So, tell me a little about yourself.....what do you do for a living?" "Well, my Silver Fox, I just love sophisticated, mature men. And later, I'll show you a REALLY good time. But first.....what interest rate are you paying on your home?" she asked seductively, leaning in close. She slid her foot under the table, rubbing it lightly against Russell's....leg. He began to squirm in his seat, hoping that the entire restaurant didn't notice that his face was turning red. "Um," he said nervously, stuttering slightly, "7%, why do you ask?" "Well....I'd like to make you an offer you can't refuse. Take a long hard look at this, darling. I think you'll get really excited about this figure. And it's not 'back-end loaded' with a huge hidden fee, either." she said, leaning down just far enough to let him see her "assets" as she seductively slid the loan contract across the table, stroking her pen lightly with the other hand, and sliding the tip into her mouth..... Who could resist such charms? Certainly not Russell. It wasn't long before they were back in her office, "sealing the deal". But then, as soon as he signed the contract, she suddenly became cold and aloof, and shook his hand limply, barely even looking up at him. Then she turned towards the office door. "Okay, who's next?" It was then that Russell realized he'd been a victim of the oldest con in the book - the "Dating / Mortgage Refinancing" scam. He suddenly felt pathetic, cheap, and yes, used. There was nothing left to do but zip up his......briefcase, put his, um, "contract" back in his pants, and leave. Russell had learned his lesson, he only hoped that in the end, the transfer fees wouldn't be too stiff..... Saturday , March 12, 2005  14:25 <<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 >>> Search this blog: Message : - Name : - All : Search: